Final answer:
Jeff Ballinger presents a convincing argument about Nike's labor practices, while Nike's response may not be as convincing in addressing the issues.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jeff Ballinger presents a convincing argument about Nike's labor practices. He highlights the issue of sweatshop labor and the exploitation of workers in Nike's supply chain, providing evidence and examples to support his claims. His argument raises important ethical concerns about the treatment of workers.Nike's response, on the other hand, may not be as convincing. While the company has implemented some reforms and introduced codes of conduct, there are still ongoing reports of labor violations in their factories. This suggests that Nike's response may be insufficient in addressing the systemic issues raised by Ballinger.In conclusion, Jeff Ballinger's argument about Nike is compelling, shedding light on the unethical practices in their supply chain. Nike's response, although it has made some efforts, falls short in fully addressing the concerns and ensuring the fair treatment of workers.