Question

Creationists often use the complexity and perfection of the human eye as an argument against evolution. What do you think of this?

A. The complexity of the human eye is a valid argument against evolution, supporting the idea of intelligent design.

B. The complexity of the human eye can be explained by evolutionary processes, and it does not necessarily contradict the theory of evolution.

C. The argument against evolution based on the human eye's complexity is scientifically unfounded and lacks evidence.

D. Both creationism and evolution can coexist, with the complexity of the human eye being a result of a combination of evolutionary processes and intelligent design.

Answer 1

The complexity of the human eye can be explained by evolutionary processes and does not contradict the theory of evolution. Both creationism and evolution can coexist, with the human eye's complexity being a result of a combination of evolutionary processes and intelligent design.

Step-by-step explanation:

The complexity of the human eye can be explained by evolutionary processes, and it does not necessarily contradict the theory of evolution. The argument against evolution based on the human eye's complexity is scientifically unfounded and lacks evidence. Both creationism and evolution can coexist, with the complexity of the human eye being a result of a combination of evolutionary processes and intelligent design.