Final answer:
A naïve logical argument against the existence of God may not be considered rational because it may have flaws and may not convince a rational person to accept its conclusion.
Step-by-step explanation:
A naïve logical argument against the existence of God may not be considered rational because it may have flaws and may not convince a rational person to accept its conclusion. The key to a rational argument is providing evidence and logical reasoning to support the conclusion, rather than solely relying on emotions or past history.