asked 87.3k views
2 votes
When a potential explicitly depends on time, energy is not conserved. However, if we take into account what is causing this potential (for example, a machine moving some object(s)), would the total energy of the combined system be conserved? I'd like to know if there's any proof one way or the other in the most general case.

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

When a potential explicitly depends on time, energy is not conserved. However, if we take into account what is causing this potential, the total energy of the combined system can be conserved.

Step-by-step explanation:

When a potential explicitly depends on time, energy is not conserved. However, if we take into account what is causing this potential (for example, a machine moving some object(s)), the total energy of the combined system can be conserved. This is because when we consider the combined system, we include the energy associated with the external force or agent causing the potential. In general, the conservation of energy depends on the specific details of the system and the forces acting on it.

answered
User Ankit Agarwal
by
8.1k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.