Final answer:
The custodian in question likely does not have authority or permission to directly care for or handle creatures professionally at the restaurant. His role seems to be limited to maintenance and janitorial tasks rather than interacting with the menagerie, and any 'No Pets' policies altered at home are unrelated to his work duties.
Step-by-step explanation:
The main answer to the student's question about which creatures the custodian is allowed to care for or handle is not explicitly provided in the excerpts. However, we can infer that he does not have direct responsibility for handling animals based on the context provided. The text from LibreTexts paints a picture of an individual who is surrounded by the sights, sounds, and smells of animals but is hesitant to approach the administration, suggesting he may not have the authority or permission to interact with them. Further support of this inference comes from the description of his job as 'lower class' and an 'obstacle on the way to the menagerie', which implies his role is in janitorial or maintenance services rather than animal care. Additionally, the mention of a changed 'No Pets' rule when a stray cat arrives hints at a policy level at which creatures he may encounter but not necessarily be allowed to care for within a professional capacity.Explanation in more than 100 words: It seems the student's question stems from a narrative context describing the custodian's experiences at a restaurant with close proximity to a menagerie. While the text doesn't state exact permissions regarding animal care, the custodian seems to have a passive role concerning the animals. The main duties of his job likely focus on cleaning and maintaining the premises rather than directly interacting with animals. Conversing with the administration about the animals suggests a separation between his responsibilities and the animal care team. Also, the adjustment in personal policy regarding the 'No Pets' rule is a separate domestic instance and doesn't directly apply to his professional role.Conclusion: Based on the information, the custodian at the restaurant likely does not have the authority to care for or handle animals in a professional capacity. His primary role involves maintaining the cleanliness and function of the restaurant, rather than direct interaction with the creatures housed near the dining facility.