Question

Which of the following criteria are used for evaluating the ethical standards of supporting materials?

a.
Sufficiency, accuracy, irrelevancy, timeliness, impartiality

b.
Sufficiency, accuracy, relevancy, timeliness, partiality

c.
Sufficiency, accuracy, relevancy, timeliness, partial form

d.
Controversy, accuracy, relevancy, timeliness, partial form

e.
Sufficiency, accuracy, relevancy, timeliness, impartiality

Answer 1

The correct criteria for evaluating the ethical standards of supporting materials are sufficiency, accuracy, relevancy, timeliness, and impartiality. These ensure that material is adequate, correct, current, relevant, and unbiased.

Step-by-step explanation:

The criteria used for evaluating the ethical standards of supporting materials are sufficiency, accuracy, relevancy, timeliness, and impartiality.

These criteria ensure that the material is adequate in quantity, correct and verifiable, directly related to the subject at hand, current and up-to-date, and without bias.

To evaluate these criteria, one might utilize the CRAAP test, which stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. This test is a methodical way to assess the reliability and credibility of any source by posing pertinent questions.

Evaluating a source's ethics includes considering the source's background and expertise, the consensus among experts, any possible bias, and the relevance of the evidence provided.

For example, a historian receiving testimony from another historian would consider whether the provided testimony aligns with expert consensus.

In addition, the historian would examine if there is any bias that could skew the testimony's perception. Furthermore, the timeliness of the research is important, especially in fields that change rapidly like technology or medicine, where up-to-date information is crucial.