Final answer:
False,The claim that a declaration against interest can only be admitted if the person testifies at trial is false. Such statements are admissible if certain criteria are met, even without the declarant's testimony.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that a declaration against interest may only be introduced if the person who made the statement testifies at trial is false.
A declaration against interest is an exception to the hearsay rule, which typically excludes statements made out of court from being admissible as evidence.
However, if the person who made the statement is unavailable and the statement is sufficiently against the declarant's interest, it may indeed be admissible even without the declarant's testimony at trial.
This concept is based on the principle that people do not make statements which are against their own interest unless the statements are true.
Therefore, the corrected statement is: A declaration against interest may be admitted into evidence even if the person who made the statement does not testify at trial, provided certain conditions are met.