Final answer:
Stephen's statement, "We are both the enemy and not the enemy," reflects ambivalence and acknowledges the internal conflict caused by being part of a prejudiced system. The chapter supports the importance of anti-racist discourse and the persistent challenge of racial biases in society.
Step-by-step explanation:
When Stephen says at the chapter's end, "We are both the enemy and not the enemy", he is likely expressing a sense of ambivalence regarding the complex nature of human interactions, particularly within the context of racial dynamics and prejudice. This statement could also hint at an understanding of both sides harboring prejudices yet also being victims of it. There's an acknowledgment of the internal conflict that comes from being a party to a system one may not agree with but is nonetheless a part of. It mirrors the broader societal conflict between groups with entrenched biases and those affected by them.
The chapter dives into the lasting impact of language on culture and advocates for the development of anti-racist and inclusive discourse. The struggle against the backdrop of hostility and discrimination is keenly felt and critiqued.
Moreover, the quote from Stephen aligns with the sentiments expressed by significant historical figures and analysis provided in the text. For instance, Thomas Jefferson's reflection on the divisive nature of racial prejudices and the potential consequences for society can be seen as a precursor to the current echoes in Stephen's words. Likewise, the book's exploration of the negative internal effects of racism on both the perpetrators and the recipients also aligns with the idea that 'we are both the enemy and not the enemy'.