Question

What exceptions are there to this idea, according to Nagel? (In other words, what kinds of governmental actions or policies should be forbidden even if they produce a better outcome?)

a) No exceptions, all governmental actions are justified
b) Actions violating fundamental principles should be forbidden
c) Exceptions only for economic policies
d) Exceptions only for actions with popular support

Answer 1

Nagel argues that actions violating fundamental principles should be forbidden, even if they produce a better outcome.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to Nagel, there are exceptions to the idea that all governmental actions or policies are justified. He suggests that actions violating fundamental principles should be forbidden, regardless of the outcome they produce. This means that even if a particular action leads to a better outcome, it should be prohibited if it goes against basic ethical or moral principles. Nagel's argument is that there are certain actions that are inherently wrong, and no amount of positive outcome can justify them.