Question

Shakura assumes that because ice cream consumption and drowning deaths increase at the same time, that eating ice cream causes people to drown. This assumption is an example of which fallacy or bias?

Option 1: Hasty Generalization
Option 2: Post Hoc Fallacy
Option 3: Correlation Implies Causation Fallacy
Option 4: Appeal to Authority

Answer 1

Shakura's assumption represents the Correlation Implies Causation Fallacy, which misconstrues correlation between two events as a causative relationship without proper evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

Shakura's assumption that eating ice cream causes people to drown is an example of the Correlation Implies Causation Fallacy. This fallacy, also known as false cause or post hoc fallacy, occurs when one mistakenly interprets two correlated events as having a cause-and-effect relationship, when no such connection has been established. An increase in ice cream consumption and drowning deaths during the same time period are likely to be influenced by an unrelated third factor, such as warmer weather, which can cause both to rise simultaneously.