asked 224k views
2 votes
Sarah owns a new company. New companies are more likely to fail than well-established companies. Therefore:

Sarah's company is more likely to fail than a well-established company.
A.Conclusion Follows
B.Conclusion Does Not Follow

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The conclusion follows. Sarah's company is more likely to fail than a well-established company.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conclusion follows. The statement establishes a general principle that new companies are more likely to fail than well-established companies. Based on this principle, it can be logically inferred that Sarah's company, being new, is also more likely to fail compared to a well-established company. Therefore, the conclusion that Sarah's company is more likely to fail than a well-established company follows.

answered
User Anubian Noob
by
7.5k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.