Final answer:
The statement that journalism is a scientific and objective method of communication is false, as journalism is not a scientific method and its objectivity can be challenged by bias, interpretive reporting, and misinformation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Journalism is a scientific and objective method of communication' can be considered false. Journalism aims to be objective, but it is not a scientific method per se. The concept of objective journalism, which emerged in the early twentieth century thanks to publishers like Adolph Ochs of The New York Times, involves reporters presenting facts without bias. However, journalism incorporates elements such as interpretive reporting, where analyzing and interpreting material is common. Furthermore, factors such as media bias, sensationalism, and the spread of misinformation, especially on social media, have challenged the objectivity in journalism. The scientific method relies on testable explanations and predictions, rigorous experimentation, and peer review, which are not inherent in all journalistic practices.