Final answer:
In a shared living situation, it is most efficient to allocate tasks based on each person's cleaning efficiency. However, assigning tasks according to individual strengths can create potential issues such as perceived unfairness and tension. Analogous to a trade-related situation, specialization maximizes productivity but possibly at the cost of equality in workload distribution.
Step-by-step explanation:
Optimizing Task Allocation Among Roommates
When living with roommates who do not clean up after themselves, assigning tasks based on efficiency is crucial for optimizing free time. In this scenario, you are 70% faster at doing dishes and 10% faster at vacuuming compared to your roommates. To maximize overall free time, it would be wise to assign your roommates tasks where the speed differential is lesser, making you the primary person for dishes since that is where your speed advantage is the greatest. This strategy, however, may lead to frustration due to the perceived imbalance in workload distribution and may create tension among roommates.
A potential problem with this arrangement is roommates feeling unfairly treated or discouraged from improving their cleaning skills, possibly resulting in a conflict. This situation can be compared to a trade-related analogy where specialized workers are more efficient at certain tasks, leading to a division of labor that maximizes productivity but can also result in an unequal distribution of tasks.