Final answer:
Political advocacy for health is inaccurately described as sporadic; it is actually a continuous process leveraging evidence-based findings, contrary to what Dawes suggests.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Dawes, a characteristic that does not describe political advocacy for health or related issues well is the perception that advocacy is a sporadic activity only to be pursued when issues reach a crisis level. In fact, political advocacy in health is most effective when approached as a continual process across every level of the political spectrum. It employs evidence-based findings to influence policy and decision-making, ensuring that health matters remain a priority and are addressed in a timely manner.