Final answer:
The excess vice to the virtue of justice, according to Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics, is considered to be tyranny or oppression, where an individual takes more than what is justly due.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of virtue in relation to justice can be traced back to ancient philosophical discussions, particularly in the works of Aristotle. The question asks about the excess vice corresponding to the virtue of justice.
According to Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics, virtue is a mean between two vices: one of deficiency and one of excess. In the context of justice, the excess vice is often referred to as tyranny or oppression, which involves taking more than what is fair or just. The other vice, which is the deficiency, would be injustice from a lack of giving what is due to others.
Aristotle's idea of virtue as a golden mean is a foundational concept in ethical philosophy. For Aristotle, justice as a virtue involves fair dealing both in distributing benefits (distributive justice) and in transactions (commutative justice). An excess in justice would mean an imbalance where one takes too much, and this is seen as a vice because it disrupts the harmony of society.