Question

Why did the authors of the Southern Manifesto claim that Chief Justice Earl Warren's decision was a threat to the US constitutional order? Consider what types of arguments they make. Please be as detailed as possible; I have to write an essay. And it's due today, so please answer.

A. The authors argued that Chief Justice Earl Warren's decision upheld the US constitutional order and promoted civil rights.
B. The authors claimed that Chief Justice Earl Warren's decision was a threat because it weakened the principles of segregation and states' rights.
C. The authors asserted that Chief Justice Earl Warren's decision had no impact on the US constitutional order.
D. The authors argued that Chief Justice Earl Warren's decision strengthened the US constitutional order by ensuring equal rights for all citizens.

Answer 1

The authors of the Southern Manifesto claimed that Chief Justice Earl Warren's decision was a threat to the US constitutional order because it weakened the principles of segregation and states' rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

The authors of the Southern Manifesto claimed that Chief Justice Earl Warren's decision was a threat to the US constitutional order because they believed it weakened the principles of segregation and states' rights. They argued that the decision infringed upon the rights of states to determine their own policies regarding racial segregation and interfered with the traditional social order of the South. The authors feared that the decision would lead to a breakdown of the constitutional order and create a precedent for federal intervention in other areas.