Final answer:
Western Manufacturing is likely liable for Roman's injuries under strict liability if a manufacturing defect in their product caused the injuries. Manufacturers are accountable when defects in their products cause harm, even without intention or negligence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Under strict liability in product liability law, manufacturers can be held accountable for harm caused by defective products. The manufacturer's intention or negligence is not required to be proven by the injured party. In the scenario presented, Western Manufacturing would likely be liable for Roman's injuries if caused by a defect in manufacture of their product, when that defect was responsible for making the product unreasonably dangerous to the user.
Liability is based on the existence of the defect at the time the product left the manufacturer's control and the defect causing injury.
A counter example was provided where a manufacturer knowingly sold automobiles with defective brakes, leading to liability for the resultant injuries and deaths. In the medical context, there is a debate on whether following a flawed procedure should result in liability. Moreover, the questions regarding safety standards for imported goods highlight the complexities of product liability and the need for stringent safety protocols.