asked 73.2k views
4 votes
The colonists had three options at this point, rebellion , peace , or compromise (try and talk it out with Parliament and the King). Which method would you have chosen and why?

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

If I lived under colonial rule, I would have chosen the method of compromise, trying to talk it out with Parliament and the King. This approach could potentially lead to a peaceful resolution and the satisfaction of both the colonists' demands and the British government's concerns.

Step-by-step explanation:

If I lived under colonial rule, I would have chosen the method of compromise, which would involve trying to talk it out with Parliament and the King. The reason for this choice is that compromise could potentially lead to a peaceful resolution and the satisfaction of both the colonists' demands and the British government's concerns.

For example, in May 1775, Lord North, the Prime Minister, presented a Conciliatory Proposition which offered some concessions to the colonists. This proposal suggested that Parliament would continue to legislate for the colonies, but taxes would be imposed solely to regulate trade, with the collected funds benefiting the individual colonies if they took partial responsibility for their own defense.

Although these provisions did not meet colonial expectations, they could have formed the foundation for further negotiations and compromise. By choosing the method of compromise, the colonists would have had an opportunity to assert their demands while avoiding the devastating consequences of rebellion or prolonged conflict.

answered
User LFLFM
by
8.9k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.