asked 123k views
5 votes
Segment m prime n prime has endpoints located at m² (-2, 0) and n² (2, 0). It was dilated at a scale factor of 2 from center (2, 0). Which statement describes the pre-image?

1) Segment mn is located at m (0, 0) and n (2, 0) and is half the length of segment m prime n prime.
2) Segment mn is located at m (0, 0) and n (2, 0) and is twice the length of segment m prime n prime.
3) Segment mn is located at m (0, 0) and n (4, 0) and is half the length of segment m prime n prime.
4) Segment mn is located at m² (0, 0) and n (4, 0) and is twice the length of segment m prime n prime.

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The correct pre-image statement is that segment mn is located at m (0, 0) and n (2, 0), and is half the length of segment m'n'. By analogy, doubling the side length of a square quadruples its area as seen in Marta's squares with one being twice the side length of the other.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question involves understanding the effect of a dilation transformation on a geometrical figure with respect to length and area.

Segment m'n' with endpoints at m'(^2, -2, 0) and n'(^2, 2, 0) is dilated at a scale factor of 2 from center (2, 0). When dilating at a factor of 2, the length of each segment from the center of dilation is doubled. That means if segment mn is the pre-image, its length should be half the length of segment m'n'. Given that m'n' is located along the x-axis from -2 to 2, it has a length of 4 units. Therefore, segment mn should have a length of 2 units.

Looking at the possible answers, the correct answer is: 1) Segment mn is located at m (0, 0) and n (2, 0) and is half the length of segment m'n'.

To illustrate with a similar problem, Marta's original square has a side length of 4 inches. When the dimensions are doubled, the new side length is 8 inches (twice the original). The area is found by squaring the side length; the original area is 16 square inches (4^2). The larger square then has an area of 64 square inches (8^2), which is four times greater than the area of the smaller square due to the square of the scale factor effect on area.

answered
User Julha
by
8.0k points

Related questions

1 answer
1 vote
19.6k views
asked Feb 16, 2021 160k views
KimKulling asked Feb 16, 2021
by KimKulling
8.2k points
2 answers
4 votes
160k views