Final answer:
The ruling in Maryland v. King allows the collection of DNA samples from individuals arrested for a serious offense without a warrant, based on the similarity to fingerprinting for identification purposes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ruling in Maryland v. King, refers to a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of collecting DNA samples from individuals who are arrested for a serious offense. The court held that it is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures to collect a DNA sample from an arrestee without a warrant. The court reasoned that capturing an arrestee's DNA is similar to other identification processes like fingerprinting.