Final answer:
True, majority rule can fail to provide a single preferred outcome when there are more than two choices due to Condorcet's paradox. Domestic policymaking often entails internal affairs while foreign policymaking involves international interactions and is more complex. The endurance of sole executive agreements versus treaties varies and depends on political contexts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement in question suggests that majority rule may not lead to a definitive outcome when there are more than two options to choose from. This concept is based on the idea that in a voting scenario where multiple choices are available, a majority preference might not emerge if no single option garners more than half of the votes. This phenomenon is true and is known as Condorcet's paradox or the paradox of voting. It can especially occur in elections with three or more candidates or policy options, where voters rank preferences and the collective preferences do not align to create a clear winner.
In terms of differences between domestic policymaking and foreign policymaking, one key difference is that domestic policy is primarily concerned with internal issues within a country, whereas foreign policy deals with a government's strategy in its interactions with other nations. Another noteworthy difference is the level of complexity and the number of stakeholders involved; foreign policymaking often involves international treaties, diplomatic relations, and a broader range of external factors.
As for the comparison between a sole executive agreement and a treaty, the truthfulness of the statement 'A sole executive agreement is likely to be in effect longer than is a treaty' would be context-dependent. Typically, treaties are formal agreements between countries that require ratification, often by a nation's legislature, and thus may have longer-term implications. Executive agreements, on the other hand, are made by the executive branch and can be overturned by subsequent administrations, making them potentially less enduring than treaties.
In discussing the division of labor within modern businesses, such as restaurants or large manufacturing factories, we see that the division of tasks allows for specialization and can contribute to the overall efficiency and productivity of the business. This concept is essential in understanding how complex operations manage responsibilities and workflows.