Final answer:
Staff demanding compliance from inmates through threats and intimidation can be considered coercion and abuse of power, as seen in the Stanford Prison Experiment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The point in the staff-inmate culture continuum where staff demands compliance from inmates through threats and intimidation can be considered as a form of coercion or abuse of power. This behavior can be observed in situations where staff members exhibit authoritarian tendencies and use fear and intimidation to control inmates. A prominent example of this can be seen in the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo, where guards in a simulated prison environment became increasingly sadistic towards the prisoners.