Final answer:
Martha is using inductive reasoning based on her past experiences to predict an outcome of a blind date. This type of reasoning is known as reasoning from generalities to specific instances, although it can be subject to the fallacy of weak induction.
Step-by-step explanation:
When Martha chooses not to accept a blind date set up by her friend George based on her past experiences, she is utilizing inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific instances and drawing a conclusion. In Martha's case, her reasoning from the repeated experience that blind dates set up by friends result in unsatisfactory outcomes to assume that this next date would also be a disappointment is an example of reasoning from generalities to specific instances. However, since her conclusion is based on her own personal experiences rather than a large and representative sample, it could be considered a fallacy of weak induction, which indicates that there might be too little evidence to conclusively assume the outcome of the blind date with certainty.