Final answer:
The state of a society without conflict is, philosophically and historically, considered improbable, often described as a 'state of nature' where personal interests lead to a Darwinian struggle.
Step-by-step explanation:
The state of a society with an absence of conflict and no disagreements between members might be described as utopian or harmonious. However, as several political philosophers and theorists, including Thomas Hobbes, have argued, such a state is highly unlikely. Hobbes, for instance, described a society without laws and governance as a 'state of nature,' where life is 'nasty, brutish, and short.' In this state of nature, individuals act solely based on their own interests without regard for the community, leading to a Darwinian struggle for survival.
Furthermore, different forms of government have evolved to handle the intrinsic conflicts of interest between individuals and groups, and to moderate the balance between personal freedoms and the common good. While democracies are seen as offering a stable form of governance, they are still not free from conflicts and disagreements. Historically, completely peaceful and conflict-free societies are a rarity, as human interests and social norms inherently create differences that can lead to discord without some form of resolution mechanism, often provided by the state.