Final answer:
The probability of randomly selecting 3 paraeducators from a group of 6 teachers and 3 paraeducators is 1/84. Based on this probability, there is reason to doubt the Senior Class Sponsor’s claim that the selection was truly random. The proposed simulation process of rolling three dice does not correctly simulate the random selection of 3 paraeducators.
Step-by-step explanation:
To calculate the probability of randomly selecting 3 paraeducators from a group of 6 teachers and 3 paraeducators, we need to find the number of ways to select 3 paraeducators out of the 9 total volunteers, divided by the total number of ways to select any 3 volunteers.
The number of ways to select 3 paraeducators from a group of 3 paraeducators is 1. The number of ways to select 3 volunteers from a group of 9 total volunteers is 9 choose 3, which is equal to 84. So, the probability is 1/84, or approximately 0.0119.
(b) Based on this probability, there is reason to doubt the Senior Class Sponsor’s claim that the selection was truly random. The probability of randomly selecting 3 paraeducators out of the total 9 volunteers is quite low, which suggests that the selection process may have been biased or non-random.
(c) No, the proposed simulation process of rolling three dice does not correctly simulate the random selection of 3 paraeducators from the group of 9 volunteers. The simulation assumes that each die roll has an equal chance of selecting a teacher or a paraeducator. However, in reality, there are more teachers than paraeducators, so the probability of selecting a teacher is higher than the probability of selecting a paraeducator. Therefore, the simulation process does not accurately represent the true probabilities of selecting 3 paraeducators.