menu
Qamnty
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
The Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines ruled that peaceful protesting in public schools was A. illegal because students could become harmed. B. protected under the students…
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Ask a Question
The Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines ruled that peaceful protesting in public schools was A. illegal because students could become harmed. B. protected under the students…
asked
Jan 18, 2024
153k
views
0
votes
The Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines ruled that peaceful protesting in public schools was
A.
illegal because students could become harmed.
B.
protected under the students' First Amendment rights.
C.
not protected under free speech because students are minors.
D.
allowed as long as no one was physically hurt.
History
high-school
Spencer Bigum
asked
by
Spencer Bigum
7.6k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
4
votes
B. Protected under the students’ 1st Amendment rights
Basically, first amendment guarantees five basic rights/freedoms (religion, assembly, press, petition, speech)
Tinker v. Des Moines = allows symbolic speech in school
Riet
answered
Jan 24, 2024
by
Riet
7.7k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
Related questions
asked
Aug 23, 2019
160k
views
The Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines ruled that peaceful protesting in public schools was A. allowed as long as no one was physically hurt. B. protected under the students' First Amendment rights.
Avseiytsev Dmitriy
asked
Aug 23, 2019
by
Avseiytsev Dmitriy
7.9k
points
History
college
2
answers
4
votes
160k
views
asked
Mar 11, 2024
66.3k
views
Which Supreme Court ruling held that schools could not prevent students from protesting the Vietnam War? A) Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. B) Brown v. Board of Education. C)
Dariia Prokopovych
asked
Mar 11, 2024
by
Dariia Prokopovych
8.1k
points
History
high-school
1
answer
5
votes
66.3k
views
asked
Mar 1, 2018
61.4k
views
This court case ruled that the government could only punish the advocacy of illegal action if it directly incited lawless actions. A. Schenck v. United States (1919) B. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) C. Brandenburg
Vivek Soneja
asked
Mar 1, 2018
by
Vivek Soneja
8.0k
points
Social Studies
high-school
2
answers
1
vote
61.4k
views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.
Categories
All categories
Mathematics
(3.7m)
History
(955k)
English
(903k)
Biology
(716k)
Chemistry
(440k)
Physics
(405k)
Social Studies
(564k)
Advanced Placement
(27.5k)
SAT
(19.1k)
Geography
(146k)
Health
(283k)
Arts
(107k)
Business
(468k)
Computers & Tech
(195k)
French
(33.9k)
German
(4.9k)
Spanish
(174k)
Medicine
(125k)
Law
(53.4k)
Engineering
(74.2k)
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qamnty