asked 207k views
1 vote
In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that Gideon had been denied his rights because he had

O hired an expensive lawyer he could not afford.
O not been provided an attorney when he could not afford one.
O paid bail he could not afford.
O been questioned without having his Miranda warning read.

asked
User Bafsky
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that Gideon had been denied his rights because he had not been provided an attorney when he could not afford one.


Step-by-step explanation:

In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that Gideon had been denied his rights because he had not been provided an attorney when he could not afford one. Gideon was accused of a felony and requested a lawyer, but the state of Florida did not appoint one for him. The Court held that this violated his right to counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.


Learn more about Gideon v. Wainwright

answered
User David Macek
by
8.5k points
5 votes

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

edge :)

answered
User Artyom Akselrod
by
8.4k points