asked 219k views
4 votes
In the 1830s, what was one argument against the Second National Bank?

The bank could not help pay for national expenses.
The bank kept the value of printed money unsteady.
The bank took money from common people for the wealthy.
The bank helped state banks disrupt the national economy.

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Gertjan
by
8.4k points
4 votes

Answer:

The bank took money from common people for the wealthy.

Explanation

When common people save their money in the bank, that money is used by the banks to provide loans for business owners to support their business. At that time, the opposers of the second national Bank see this as an effort made by the bank to took money from common people and distribute it to the rich. They fail to see that common people also has the opportunity to obtain loan to start new business and increase their income .

answered
User Fluffysheap
by
8.2k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.