asked 63.3k views
1 vote
In recent years, some painters of graffiti have been winning recognition as artists. But since graffiti is vandalism, painting graffiti is inherently an act of rebellion and lawbreaking. For this reason, painting graffiti is not art. Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion

asked
User Gnosis
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

4 votes

But since graffiti is vandalism, painting graffiti is inherently an act of rebellion and lawbreaking

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.