asked 83.6k views
5 votes
Which requires the most amount of work by breaks of a car?

A) slowing down from 100 km/h to 70 km/h.
B) slowing down from 79 km/h to a stop.
C) equal amounts for either.
Prove that the answer is A

asked
User BrianMiz
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

2 votes

The answer is not 'A'.
Using the numbers given in the question, it's 'B'.

It WOULD be 'A' if the number in B were 71 or less.
________________________________

This is not as simple as it looks.

What quantity are we going to compare between the two cases ?
Yes, I know ... the "amount of work". But how to find that from the
numbers given in the question ?
Is it the same as the change in speed ?
Well ? Is it ?
NO. IT's NOT.

In order to reduce the car's speed, the brakes have to absorb
the KINETIC ENERGY, and THAT changes in proportion to
the SQUARE of the speed. ( KE = 1/2 m V² )

Case 'A' :
The car initially has (1/2 m) (100²)
= (1/2m) x 10,000 units of KE.

It slows down to (1/2 m) x (70²)
= (1/2m) x 4,900 units of KE.

The brakes have absorbed (10,000 - 4,900) = 5,100 units of KE.

Case 'B' :
The car initially has (1/2 m) (79²)
= (1/2m) x 6,241 units of KE.

It slows down to a stop . . . NO kinetic energy.

The brakes have absorbed all 6,241 units of KE.

Just as we suspected when we first read the problem,
the brakes do more work in Case-B, bringing the car
to a stop from 79, than they do when slowing the car
from 100 to 70 .

But when we first read the problem and formed that
snap impression, we did it for the wrong reason.
Here, I'll demonstrate:

Change Case-B. Make it "from 71 km/h to a stop".

Here's the new change in kinetic energy for Case-B:

The car initially has (1/2 m) (71²)
= (1/2m) x 5,041 units of KE.
It slows down to a stop . . . NO kinetic energy.
The brakes have absorbed all 5,041 units of KE.

-- To slow from 100 to 70, the brakes absorbed 5,100 units of KE.

-- Then, to slow the whole rest of the way from 71 to a stop,
the brakes absorbed only 5,041 units of KE.

-- The brakes did more work to slow the car the first 30 km/hr
than to slow it to a complete stop from 71 km/hr or less.

That's why you can't just say that the bigger change in speed
requires the greater amount of work.
______________________________________

It works exactly the same in the opposite direction, too.

It takes less energy from the engine to accelerate the car
from rest to 70 km/hr than it takes to accelerate it the
next 30, to 100 km/hr !

(The exact break-even speed for this problem is 50√2 km/h,
or 70.711... km/hr rounded. )

answered
User Sayantan Mandal
by
8.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.