asked 53.3k views
1 vote
Which statement best summarizes part of the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden?

Regulating interstate commerce is an abuse of power.
A state can make laws that regulate commerce in neighboring states.
State licenses make federal licenses unnecessary.
A state can regulate commerce that takes place within its own borders.

2 Answers

3 votes

Simplified Answer:

D.

A state can regulate commerce that takes place within its own borders.

answered
User Vibha Rathi
by
9.0k points
4 votes
"A state can regulate commerce that takes place within its own borders" would be the best option, since this decision upheld the ability of Congress to regulate only interstate trade.
answered
User JBeas
by
8.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.