asked 216k views
1 vote
Which of the following describes an advantage oral history has over written history? A. Oral history creates primary sources, while written history creates only secondary sources. B. Oral history is generally credible, while written history often contains biases. C. Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. D. Oral history can only be performed by experts with a great deal of historical knowledge.

asked
User Djeetee
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Arman Safikhani
by
8.7k points
4 votes
Among the choices, the one that describes an advantage oral history has over written history is C, Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. They aren't considered primary sources because they can be changed as time goes on, depending on the storyteller.
answered
User U Rock
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.