asked 1.9k views
2 votes
Danika concludes that the following functions are inverses of each other because f(g(x)) = x. Do you agree with Danika? Explain your reasoning.

f(x) = |x|
g(x) = –x

asked
User Cfraser
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes

that Danika needs to find g compose f

that g(f(x)) must also equal x

that g(f(x)) = –x

answered
User PeteyPabPro
by
8.8k points
4 votes
We cannot agree with Danika. Why? Well, The reasoning is given as follows:

Two functions are inverses of each other if and only if it is true that the composition function is given by:


f(g(x))=x

Everything is ok up to this point, right?. But let's prove that this is not fulfilled for these functions, then:


f(x)=\left | x \right | \\ \\ g(x)=-x \\ \\ f(g(x))=\left| -x \right |=\left | -1 \right | \left | x \right |=\left | x \right | \\ \\ \therefore f(g(x))=\left | x \right | \\eq x

As you can see we did not obtain the function that matches the definition of inverse functions. For that reason we can't agree with Danika.
answered
User Bassirou
by
7.8k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.