Question

The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?

Demands on food resources in Africa increase
Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease
Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers
Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food

Answer 1

B. Incidents of starvation-related illnesses decrease.

Answer 2

The answer to your question would be the second statement. I think that the incidents of starvation-related illness decrease would be a potential negative externality for the global environment. In this case, if the Federal government approved additional funding for food resources in Africa.