A scientist makes the argument that she has found DNA evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. What would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?

Question

asked Jun 15, 2017 149k views

2 Answers

← Prev Question Next Question →

Ask a Question

IPValverde · Answer 1 · 2017-06-22T17:48:06+0000

If a scientist makes the argument that she has found DNA evidence that shows that evolution does not exist, the evidence would be the weak physical similarities among closely related organism and also among distantly related.

A scientist makes the argument that she has found DNA evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. What would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

2 Answers

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to add a comment.

No related questions found

Categories

Other Questions