asked 209k views
3 votes
historian interviews two people who fought during a certain battle during the Gulf War. One person says U.S. forces fired first; the other person says Iraqi forces fired first. To try to learn what really happened, the historian should:

asked
User Zyzof
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes
If both parties involved are blaming the other for the start of the battle, the historian should try to get the statement of a 3rd party witness, preferably one that is impartial and a first-hand witness. This makes the 3rd party witness more credible. This also avoids any self-serving motives of the the US and Iraqi forces.
answered
User Ardb
by
8.6k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.