asked 141k views
0 votes
In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court decided

End of exam
A. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without
the due process of law.
B. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states.
C. the Compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without
the due process of law.
D. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave of his or her freedom if they lived
in the South.

asked
User Radek
by
8.6k points

2 Answers

3 votes
well the supreme court ruled that dredd Scott was still a slave and was still technically property to his master.
answered
User Zeisi
by
8.8k points
1 vote
a. the Missouri compromise was illegal without due process of law

answered
User Nick Rupley
by
8.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.