Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

Question

asked Aug 16, 2017 79.0k views

1 Answer

Sora · Answer 1 · 2017-08-22T21:31:16+0000

because you would want to have a better understanding and from some one who witnessed or they were involved in. Secondary is when you read about something in a book or article,you werent there to see it happen or to actually witness it.

Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

Please log in or register to add a comment.

No related questions found

Categories

Other Questions