asked 89.4k views
4 votes
Read this claim:

There should be no minimum voting age.
Which statement about the claim is true?
A. It is arguable but not defensible.
B. It is defensible but not arguable.
C. It is neither arguable nor defensible.
D. It is both arguable and defensible.

asked
User Nietaki
by
8.9k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer: The claim "There should be no minimum voting age" is both arguable and defensible, as there are valid arguments that can be made both for and against the idea of having a minimum voting age. Therefore, the correct answer is D.

answered
User Charlie Bear
by
7.3k points
0 votes

The statement about the claim that is true is option A: It is arguable but not defensible.

It is arguable in several point like the following: You can be very young emocionally and in that way be psychologically vulnerable; it´s difficult to have an objective knowledge about politics and young people are highly influenced.

For reasons such as those mentioned above, is not defensible.

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.