Register

Why do historians need to distinguish between causation and correlation?

Why do historians need to distinguish between causation and correlation?
asked 140k views
5 votes
Why do historians need to distinguish between causation and correlation?

asked
User Rashawn
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

4 votes
"Correlation by itself is understood not to be sufficient to conclude causation."
answered
User Aleksandr Yatsenko
by
7.5k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Erichui
asked Dec 6, 2017 88.8k views
Why do historians need to distinguish between causation and correlation?
Erichui asked Dec 6, 2017
by Erichui
8.7k points
1 answer
2 votes
88.8k views
User Shofol
asked Mar 11, 2017 102k views
Why do historians need to distinguish between causation and correlation?
Shofol asked Mar 11, 2017
by Shofol
8.4k points
1 answer
1 vote
102k views
User RedGiant
asked Mar 17, 2023 205k views
Why do historians need to distinguish between causation and correlation?
RedGiant asked Mar 17, 2023
by RedGiant
8.2k points
1 answer
9 votes
205k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.

Categories

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
Link Copied!