asked 53.3k views
0 votes
The Sixth Amendment was interpreted in (3 points)

a) Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

b) Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

c) Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

d) Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

asked
User PPrice
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

1 vote
The answer to this question is choice b.)

answered
User MannyNS
by
8.3k points
3 votes
The correct answer is
b) gideon v wain to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it
answered
User Riajul
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.