asked 38.6k views
3 votes
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel.What Constitutional amendment was interpreted in both of these cases?

a.Fourth AmendmentB.Fifth AmendmentC.Sixth AmendmentD.Eighth Amendmentit isn't B

2 Answers

2 votes
C. Sixth Amendment Hope I Helped !
answered
User Mohan Dere
by
7.8k points
2 votes

Answer:

C.Sixth Amendment

Step-by-step explanation:

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution codifies rights related to criminal cases in federal courts. The Supreme Court has ruled that these rights are so fundamental and important that the Fourteenth Amendment protects them in state courts by the due process clause.

answered
User Adrian Florescu
by
8.2k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.