asked 87.8k views
5 votes
Scientists must be able to repeat an experiment and get very similar results; otherwise their conclusions will be questioned. If the results of a repeated experiment are different from the original results, the results of the experiment

A. lack bias
B. are precise
C. lack controls
D. are flawed

asked
User Saska
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

4 votes
Hey there!

The correct answer is the fourth option or Choice D.


Hope this helps!
answered
User Shrewdu
by
8.0k points
4 votes

The correct answer is option D. are flawed.

The experiments, which are given by a scientist for peer review or as a claim, must be replicatable. the replication of the experiment helps in the removal of any biases and determines the accuracy of the experiment.

In case, the experiments are not able to be repeated or replicated then they must have some flaws. Presence or absence of the control does not determines its accuracy, it only helps in the comparison of the result obtained.

answered
User Tshauck
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.