asked 158k views
4 votes
Was the cost of the war higher for the North or the South? Be sure to consider the social, political, and economic effects of the war. Explain, in a paragraph of your own words, which side paid a higher price for the war. Include at least two specific pieces of evidence from the lesson to support your response. Include information from at least two sections of the lesson (Social, Economic, or Political) to support your response.

asked
User Halorium
by
7.4k points

2 Answers

2 votes
The north pay less on the south slavery was not finish and they where trying to go to the north for better jobs and freedom the south had force slaves to work
answered
User Toph
by
7.9k points
0 votes

Answer:

The cost of the war was higher for the South rather that the North.

Step-by-step explanation:

The costs of war for both sides were similar in magnitude and although the estimates are very complex and questionable, the figures are illustrative. The total loss for the Union was calculated in 2,188 billion of 1860 dollars and for the Confederation 2,017 billion in the same terms. Due to the difference in population, this represented a per capita expenditure of $ 96 for the Union and $ 380 for the Confederation. That is, the "Sacrifice" assumed by the Confederates reached four times that of the Union in terms per capita.

answered
User Crowley
by
7.9k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.