asked 181k views
2 votes
In morales v. chicago, the u.s. supreme court held that the city's anti-gang ordinance was unconstitutional because it

1 Answer

4 votes
For the main reason that it was not furthermore stated in the constitution, the u.s. supreme court that held that the city's anti-gang was considered to be unconstitutional. In addition, a policy or act could be considered as a "constitutional" one if it is not in accordance to the United States book of laws.
answered
User M Jae
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.