Question

The article “Head Games” can actually be considered an argument. Write down what you think makes it an argument and whether it is effective or not. If you don’t think it is making an argument, explain why you don’t think it is, or why you don’t think it is effective.

Help! If you don't know it then don't comment or else!

Answer 1

its an argument

Step-by-step explanation:

In the beginning or so the starting of the researchers tell you that they did some get the facts right. the argument is you shouldn't just shake it off because once you get hit again can receive permanent damages. The other facts from the story will support this claim.

Don't forget that if you copy and paste be sure to edit.

Answer 2

I don't think Head Games is an argument. It does not present any ideas and try to support it with details. If it was to be considered as an argument, then it would be ineffective. A deeper analysis of the article may present some argumentative ideas.