asked 54.4k views
1 vote
In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate many services benefiting the community, including the Children's Story Hour.

Which is a piece of relevant evidence in support of Joshua's claim and reasoning?


A: Without Story Hour, the kids will be getting more TV and less literature.

B: The annual circulation of the library is .5 million volumes. That statistic means that the residents of our city borrowed approximately a half million volumes.

C: Over the years, sitting in a circle with many other children, I must have listened to dozens of wonderful stories and poems.

D: I began attending these weekly events even before I was able to read; I was three or four years old, according to my mother.

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

The answer is A!

Step-by-step explanation:

In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate-example-1
answered
User Owo
by
7.7k points
4 votes
A would be the most relevant because it shows a negative consequence to getting rid of Children's Story Hour.
answered
User Wiktor Walc
by
8.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.