asked 15.5k views
0 votes
"Under our Constitution, free speech is not a right that is given only to be so circumscribed that it exists in principle, but not in fact. Freedom of expression would not truly exist if the right could be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots." which is the best summary of the passage?

2 Answers

0 votes
In his majority opinion on Tinker v. Des Moines, Justice Fortas argues that free speech would not truly exist if people could only express their opinion in a designated place.
answered
User Toby Holland
by
8.7k points
4 votes

Answer:

Free speech would not truly exist if people could only express their opinion in a designated place.

Step-by-step explanation:

It wouldn't be free speech as you could just express yourself in certain places provided by other people.

answered
User Debnath Sinha
by
9.5k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.