asked 111k views
4 votes
At age 70, Fiona lives alone, owns a house valued at $350,000, and has paid off the mortgage completely. Fiona has no other assets to live on. She can choose a reverse mortgage that gives her payments of $32,000 a year for 10 years or one that pays her $20,000 a year for as long as she lives in the house. Fiona opts for the $32,000-a-year reverse mortgage. Did Fiona do the right thing, considering that women of her age live 14 more years on average?

A~ Yes, because she can live rent-free for 10 years and receives a larger income for those years.
B~ Yes, because she gets value out of the house in a form she can use.
C~ No, because she may be unable to live in the house that long or if she lives longer, she will be broke.
D~ No, because reverse mortgages only make sense for people under 50 years old.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

A~ Yes, because she can live rent-free for 10 years and receives a larger income for those years.

Explanation:

Reverse mortgage loans allow homeowners to convert their home equity into cash income with no monthly mortgage payments.

It is a type of loan for seniors age 62 and older.

So, given is Fiona is 70 years, this age condition is checked.

Fiona opts for the $32,000-a-year reverse mortgage for 10 years. Also given that women of her age live 14 more years on average.

So, yes she did the right thing. She can live rent-free for 10 years and receives a larger income for those years.

If she lives beyond 10 years, she must have saved enough by that time.

answered
User Gagan Joshi
by
8.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.