asked 111k views
0 votes
What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck?

Lamarak was able to explain evolution with evidence something Darwin did not do
the idea of mutations was understood by both but Lamarck was able to prove it
Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence something Lamarck did not do
the idea of mutations was understood by both but Darwin was able prove it

asked
User Jjnevis
by
8.9k points

2 Answers

4 votes
What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck?

(Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do!)

The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it.

The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Lamarck was able to prove it.

Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do

The First one is correct

answered
User Javier Cadiz
by
8.6k points
3 votes
The answer is the idea of mutations was understood by both but Lamarck was able to prove it.
answered
User Jiluo
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.